web stats

Out of Excuses

« previous entry | next entry »
22nd Apr 2006 | 12:18 pm
location: Brooklyn, New York
disposition: energetic energetic
diversion: "Broken Flag" by Patti Smith

"When an Author's Muse Packs Up and Leaves," an interesting article by Catherine Keenan about writer's block, appeared one week ago today in The Sydney Morning Herald.

If you're a writer, you know how it feels: you can't write. If you're not a writer, you almost certainly have heard about it or seen it dramatized in books or film: the tortured writer, elbows akimbo on the Remington with head in hands, for whatever reason unable to get the words from his or her fingertips onto the page.

Writer's block, the bugaboo that appears on the wing of the unnerved author's flight of fancy and renders him or her uncreative, afflicted authors as stellar as Truman Capote, Harper Lee, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Herman Melville, and Arthur Rimbaud, to name just a few. And, if you believe all that's been written on the subject, it can happen to you.

The question is, why we continue to attribute so much dignity to what is simply the downside of the faith versus fear battle that wages within all writers: Do we have faith that what we write is worthy, or do we succumb to the fear that our writing isn't worth reading? Are we frightened and frozen by that imposing blank page -- or do we receive it as an unbound invitation on which to create new worlds? 
                                                           
If you treat writing as a holy act, it's understandable how a mere writer could crumble under the pressure to perform. At the 1998 DragonCon in Atlanta, Georgia, as part of a "Masters of Fantasy" panel discussion that included fellow fantasist Ray Bradbury and special effects legend Ray Harryhausen, Harlan Ellison called writing "the single most egocentric act I think a human being can commit. If you're an architect, you build a building -- it's for people's use. If you do a song, it is for people to hear. But writing... When you write for publication, what you're saying is, 'I am so important, and these ideas are so great, you must read these.' That's egomania unleashed. And when it happens in the general populace, they put you in a rubber suit and put you away in a funny room. When we do it, they say, 'Ah, posterity -- great writer!' It's rampant egomania, but since we are all writing for posterity, that's it, that's the secret, that's the bottom line: we are all writing so that we will be remembered."

More online ruminations on the subject include Paul Saevig's "If Tolstoy Could Do It: Some Thoughts On Writer's Block," and Stephen Gallagher's essay "Writer's Block." (And though both pieces take jabs at Ellison for supposedly having dodged writer's block, the author himself confessed to being unable to write when it came time to adapt his novella A Boy and His Dog to the screen.

Less sympathetic on the subject is JA Konrath, who has written over at his fine blog A Newbies Guide to Publishing: "I've talked with writers about the anguish of writer's block. They speak of their WIPs [works in progress] like it is a monumental task to be conquered, a war to be fought, torture to be endured.

"This is how you want to spend your free time?"

In a different essay, Konrath asked, "Do plumbers need to get inspired? Do bartenders ever become blocked and unable to mix drinks? Can mechanical engineers only design a linkage when in the proper mindset?"

His points are well taken. Isn't writer's block merely a fancy diagnosis we hang on what happens when a writer (a) has nothing to say, (b) has something to say but doesn't know how to say it, or (c) has something to say but is afraid to say it? (If writing isn't Ellison's rampant egomania, it's at least an act of bravery.) In my twenty years as a published writer, I've endured numerous periods when I thought I couldn't write -- but usually it was because I'd excused myself because I was too tired, too depressed, had nothing interesting to say, or, more often than not, was just too damn lazy.

In the last four months, however, I've written more than I have in years. I've completed three short stories, am almost halfway through the first draft of a novel, and contribute regularly to this blog. What happened? Long story short, I made several significant changes in my life and my lifestyle that made me a happier man. By deciding that I'd rather write than bemoan not writing, I ran out of excuses not to write. 

Tags:

Link | Care to Comment? | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {24}

NY Deborah

Great Thoughts On Obliterating Writer's Block

from: [info]nydeborah
date: 22nd Apr 2006 04:38 pm (UTC)
Link

It puzzles me, though. What ever happened four months ago to cause such rapturous productivity? Hmmm..... I wonder. And did you forget that you also sold your first screenplay, silly?

Reply | Thread

chidder

Re: Great Thoughts On Obliterating Writer's Block

from: [info]chidder
date: 22nd Apr 2006 04:53 pm (UTC)
Link

Oh yeah, the screenplay. I failed to mention that, didn't I? Silly me.

As far as what happened four months ago (to this very day, as a matter of fact), I significantly reduced the distance that separated me from my one true love. By subtracting the miles and replacing them with the love and care of a good woman (the best good woman in the world), the quality of my life -- and my writing -- immensely improved.

Reply | Parent | Thread

chinedum ofoegbu

(no subject)

from: [info]razorsmile
date: 22nd Apr 2006 06:33 pm (UTC)
Link

By deciding that I'd rather write than bemoan not writing, I ran out of excuses not to write.

...

... WIN. You're absolutely painfully right.

Reply | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]a_n_a_n_d_i
date: 22nd Apr 2006 07:37 pm (UTC)
Link

Greetings!

Thanks so much for sharing this with us. Besides that it is fantastically well written, it does make sense out of what "writers block" really means. I myself have suffered all the symptoms. It was at this point where I decided to join [info]musemuggers.

The way I see it, writers are kinda expected to always be writing. I, for example, grew up in a family of intellectuals, where "writers block" is almost always our fault. There is no excuses for it! If you call yourself a writer, you write. Period.

Sad, but true. I think that it's our thing. We are writers, we write. You can't? Find a way! LOL!

For me whenever I had too much stress, etc, it used to be impossible to write a word! Now, what I decided to do is acquire the discipline. I write. Some days I write very inspiring things, it's great. Other days my stories/poems are not so good, but it's okay, as long as my words keep flowing.

I hope to make sense. In any case, please do cross post this wherever you can! It's awesome!

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 02:10 pm (UTC)
Link

Thanks for your kind words. You're absolutely correct: writers should write. To paraphrase Joe Konrath, plumbers don't walking around whining about wanting to fix a leak in a pipe -- they fix it. As with any other job, a writer needs to "show up to work" daily and do the best s/he can. Or, as you put it so well, keep the words flowing. Thanks again.

Reply | Parent | Thread

altersonality

(no subject)

from: [info]altersonality
date: 22nd Apr 2006 07:57 pm (UTC)
Link

I see in one of the comments that you sold a screenplay. Congratulations! (I write screenplays also.)

Writers block actually happens for me more than I'd like. But you just try to keep writing, even if it's just a few words. My favorite quote is from Aaron Sorkin (who I greatly admire): “I love writing but hate starting. The page is awfully white and it says, "You may have fooled some of the people some of the time but those days are over, giftless. I'm not your agent and I'm not your mommy. I'm a white piece of paper, you wanna dance with me?" And I really, really don't.”

The white page, whether writing a screenplay or just doing character development, is very daunting (to me, at least). Once I get started, though, it's not as daunting.

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 02:22 pm (UTC)
Link

Aaron Sorkin's the best. I saw him interviewed onstage at the Screenwriters Expo in Los Angeles a few years ago, and he was (unsurprisingly) very funny and sharp and, when it came to new writers, nurturing.

You're absolutely right about the white page: as with anything else in life, you just need to take that first step, get a little momentum going, and then don't look back. Keep going until you're finished.

Reply | Parent | Thread

your dancing is like terrorism

(no subject)

from: [info]riotact
date: 23rd Apr 2006 02:05 am (UTC)
Link

I agree, the main reason I don't write is not because I don't have ideas. I have ideas running through my head all day, sometimes I must literally shoo them away.

But because I have either nothing to say or have no idea how to say it. The latter being the one most used as an excuse for me.

It really is just me being lazy, I have a very good plot for a story and have had it for about a week. I haven't written a word for it. Everytime I get on the computer, my fingers poised on the keys, I can't spill what's in my head aching to get out.

Then again, I must take into effect that I am only 16 and have my whole life to write the novel I so desire to have on the shelf. BUt it's always good to have a head start. :)

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 02:29 pm (UTC)
Link

Just as the idea of writing of novel is overwhelming (I know it used to be for me -- until I began writing it), even the idea of writing a short story can be daunting. So don't think about the end product and how long it might take you to get there. Set a goal for yourself. If five pages a day is unimaginable, then shoot for two. Or one. Even if you only write one sentence a day, over the course of a year, that adds up to a healthy chunk of writing. What you'll find, I think, if you make your goals realistic, is that you'll end up writing more than the goals you set for yourself. The rest is up to you (discipline). And, even if you don't end up writing the short story or the novel you had in mind, you'll at least have all this great material that, years from now, you can revisit and draw inspiration from.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Robert A. Geise

(no subject)

from: [info]eloquentwthrage
date: 23rd Apr 2006 05:28 am (UTC)
Link

Harlan Ellison called writing "the single most egocentric act I think a human being can commit. If you're an architect, you build a building -- it's for people's use. If you do a song, it is for people to hear. But writing... When you write for publication, what you're saying is, 'I am so important, and these ideas are so great, you must read these.' That's egomania unleashed. And when it happens in the general populace, they put you in a rubber suit and put you away in a funny room. When we do it, they say, 'Ah, posterity -- great writer!' It's rampant egomania, but since we are all writing for posterity, that's it, that's the secret, that's the bottom line: we are all writing so that we will be remembered."

(head explodes)

I know Ellison was being dramatic and "witty" (or at least trying to be), but being remembered is not the only reason some of us write. I admit, I contemplate what will happen to my work when I am dead. But when I'm not doing that, I know how much joy and amazement falls over me when I read something that someone else has written, and I can say, "Yes, I get it completely!" And if one other person can read my words and think the same thing, I am happy with that as well.

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 02:40 pm (UTC)
Link

But, by desiring that, at some point down the road, one other person reads your words and experiences the kind of joy and amazement you describe, are you not in essence asking to be remembered?

PS: Sorry about the exploding head.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Robert A. Geise

(no subject)

from: [info]eloquentwthrage
date: 23rd Apr 2006 03:00 pm (UTC)
Link

But, by desiring that, at some point down the road, one other person reads your words and experiences the kind of joy and amazement you describe, are you not in essence asking to be remembered?

Semantics will get you nowhere with me.

Reply | Parent | Thread

NY Deborah

Hmmm... Anti Semantic, eh?

from: [info]nydeborah
date: 23rd Apr 2006 03:55 pm (UTC)
Link

I can't believe that in this day and age of enlightenment you could still be anti-semantic. I just returned from Israel, and I have to tell you those semantics are quite a proud people. To survive all those thousands of years against such daunting odds, it truly makes one respect and glorify semantics, as a whole.

Why, where would we be today without the contributions of semantics through the years? Semantics have been in the forefront of many scientific and mathematic discoveries. Why, just the other day, semantics made some extraordinary strides in the race for a cure for diabetes, a life threatening illness. I am shocked and appalled by your callous disregard for this entire class of people.

Oh! Um... er... gee, is my face red.
I thought you said Semetic.
Never mind.

Reply | Parent | Thread

jerrylovesmona

Re: Hmmm... Anti Semantic, eh?

from: [info]jerrylovesmona
date: 1st May 2006 06:31 am (UTC)
Link

Gilda Radner's ghost!

Reply | Parent | Thread

jerrylovesmona

Re: Hmmm... Anti Semantic, eh?

from: [info]jerrylovesmona
date: 1st May 2006 06:32 am (UTC)
Link

I want recognition, but I don't want it after I'm dead. I want it now, while I can still enjoy it. The world can explode after I die, for all I care. I won't be around to be bothered by it.

Reply | Parent | Thread

chidder

Re: Hmmm... Anti Semantic, eh?

from: [info]chidder
date: 1st May 2006 12:25 pm (UTC)
Link

I just checked with the world, and she feels the same way about us.

Reply | Parent | Thread

child of a silent winter ...

(no subject)

from: [info]vyadh
date: 23rd Apr 2006 01:16 pm (UTC)
Link

Hmm ...

I have to say, I don't agree with the Ellison quote at all. It works on the basis that writing is of no value. If people hearing a song is somehow 'useful', I don't see why writing for people to read doesn't also qualify.

I write, but I don't want to be known, let alone remembered. I'm in the (admittedly) very early stages of writing a novel and yet have zero desire to ever get it, or anything else I write, published. So how does that fit in?

As far as writer's block goes, I can't say I've ever suffered it. My novel is proving challenging, but I realise that's mainly because I feel I can't yet do the main character justice (or perhaps I'm making excuses, too).

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 03:22 pm (UTC)
Link

Ellison's comments re writing were clearly prefaced with "When you write for publication..." (And, ironically, because I was more interested in what Ellison had to say in regards to writing for posterity, I had excised these words: "The act of writing, unless you write it and you put it in your drawer for nobody but yourself, if you write you're writing for publication...")

You argue (quite effectively) that "writing for people to read" should also qualify as "useful"; but then you say that you have no desire to publish anything you write. If you write for your own pleasure, then you have fulfilled your mission. That's how you fit in. But it does beg the question, if your writing brings you pleasure, why you wouldn't want to share that with others?

Reply | Parent | Thread

tomt2

block heads

from: [info]tomt2
date: 23rd Apr 2006 03:58 pm (UTC)
Link

Probably the easiest way to avoid writer's block is the Asimov way, do more than one project at a time. Generally you can skip back and forth and find at least one project which you can find something to say about. This way there's no the last project has absolutely ended, all ahead is a blank page. You finish one, you continue another. And for those of us who procrastinate from finishing one project by starting another new one, a blank page is occasionally welcome. I also like the Hemingway trick of ending your writing day in the middle of a sentence you know the end to. You will then finish that sentence the next day and be on your bicycle, so to speak. Finally, doing a journal simultaneous with creative writing seems to loosen up the pen. I enjoy the Steinbeck books written on the other side of a journal when he was writing EAST OF EDEN and the like, mostly they would start out as a letter to the editor Pascal Covici about what he was doing with EAST OF EDEN, but he could free associate and complain about his wife and crabgrass etc. until he had worked his way into the proper frame of mind to continue with EAST OF EDEN.

Reply | Thread

chidder

Re: block heads

from: [info]chidder
date: 23rd Apr 2006 06:57 pm (UTC)
Link

Thanks for the great comments and suggestions. I'd never heard the Steinbeck story before. Interesting stuff.

Reply | Parent | Thread

tomt2

Re: Writing

from: [info]tomt2
date: 24th Apr 2006 03:06 pm (UTC)
Link

Enjoy your website. Thanks for all the interesting stuff you post for writers!

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]crazy_dumbsaint
date: 29th Apr 2006 02:26 pm (UTC)
Link

"I ran out of excuses not to write."

I'll drink to that! I'm so glad I found your blog.

*goes back to exploring*

Reply | Thread

chidder

(no subject)

from: [info]chidder
date: 29th Apr 2006 07:11 pm (UTC)
Link

I'm glad you found it, too. Enjoy!

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]crazy_dumbsaint
date: 29th Apr 2006 07:14 pm (UTC)
Link

I will :) I've been really looking for writers online--we need all the encouragement we can get!

Reply | Parent | Thread